Non-Heterophile Antibody Interference with Falsely Low Results
Endogenous antibodies directed against the analyte itself can interfere with immunoassays by blocking the detection antibodies, thereby preventing accurate quantification and leading to falsely low or undetectable results. Unlike heterophile antibodies, these are analyte-specific and directly interfere with the assay’s ability to measure the target substance.
Non-Heterophile Antibody Interference with Falsely Elevated Results
Endogenous antibodies and binding proteins can also lead to falsely elevated test results. A notable example involves prolactin, which exists in multiple molecular forms: the biologically active monomeric prolactin (~23 kDa), along with dimeric prolactin (~50 kDa) and macroprolactin (>100 kDa), the latter being a complex of prolactin with immunoglobulin G (IgG). While macroprolactin is biologically inactive, it has preserved immunoreactivity and therefore is still detected by most immunometric assays, resulting in falsely elevated prolactin levels.
To detect macroprolactin interference, polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation is a widely used and cost-effective method. PEG removes macroprolactin by precipitation, allowing only monomeric prolactin to remain in the supernatant. A PEG-precipitable prolactin fraction exceeding 60% suggests significant macroprolactinemia, helping distinguish it from true hyperprolactinemia.
Macro-TSH represents another example of this phenomenon, potentially causing falsely elevated TSH levels.
References
All Illustrations are Created in https://BioRender.com
Haddad, R.A., Giacherio, D. & Barkan, A.L. Interpretation of common endocrine laboratory tests: technical pitfalls, their mechanisms and practical considerations. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol 5, 12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40842-019-0086-7
Petrovic I, LoPresti J, Fatemi S, Gianoukakis A, Burman K, Gomez-Lima CJ, Nguyen CT, Spencer CA. Influence of Thyroglobulin Autoantibodies on Thyroglobulin Levels Measured by Different Methodologies: IMA, LC-MS/MS, and RIA. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Nov 18;109(12):3254-3263. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae286. PMID: 38686504; PMCID: PMC11570386.
Kitamura Y, Narita S, Yagi S, Aoyagi K. Thyroglobulin immunoassay with a fully automated pretreatment process provides accurate thyroglobulin values in anti-thyroglobulin antibody positive specimens. Clin Biochem. 2023 Aug;118:110598. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2023.110598. Epub 2023 Jun 16. PMID: 37330000.
Fahie-Wilson MN, Cobbaert CM, Horvath AR, Smith TP. Interference by macroprolactin in assays for prolactin: will the In Vitro Diagnostics Regulation lead to a solution at last? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022 Jun 15;60(9):1350-1355. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0460. PMID: 35704648.
Loh TP, Kao SL, Halsall DJ, Toh SA, Chan E, Ho SC, Tai ES, Khoo CM. Macro-thyrotropin: a case report and review of literature. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Jun;97(6):1823-8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-3490. Epub 2012 Mar 30. PMID: 22466337.
Smith TP, Kelly S, Fahie-Wilson MN. Cross-reactivity in assays for prolactin and optimum screening policy for macroprolactinaemia. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022 Jun 17;60(9):1365-1372. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0459. PMID: 35708266.
Wheeler, Michael J. Hormone Assays in Biological Fluids. Edited by Michael J. Wheeler, 2nd ed. 2013., vol. 1065, Humana Press, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-616-0.
© 2025 EndoCases. All rights reserved.
This platform is intended for medical professionals, particularly endocrinology residents, and is provided for educational purposes only. It supports learning and clinical reasoning but is not a substitute for professional medical advice or patient care. The information is general in nature and should be applied with appropriate clinical judgment and in accordance with local guidelines.
All of the content is independent of my employer.
Use of this site implies acceptance of our Terms of Use
Contact us via E-Mail: contact@endo-cases.com